Pain-related hospitalization and emergency room visit following initial analgesic prescription after outpatient surgery.

PURPOSE: Our study examined the association between outpatient postsurgical analgesic prescription and risk of insufficiently managed pain characterized by pain-associated hospital admission and emergency room (ER) visit. METHODS: Eligible individuals were children 1-17 years of age who filled an incident analgesic following an outpatient surgery during 2013-2018. Pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit were measured within 30 days following the outpatient surgical procedure. A hierarchical multivariable logistic regression model with patients nested under prescribers was fitted to test the association between incident analgesic prescription and risk of having pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit. RESULTS: Of 14 277 children meeting the inclusion criteria, 6224 (43.6%) received an incident opioid and 8053 (56.4%) received an incident non-opioid analgesic prescription respectively. There were a total of 523 (3.7%) children undergoing surgical procedures that had pain-related hospital admissions or ER visits with 5.1% initiated on non-opioid analgesics and 1.8% on opioid analgesics. The multilevel model indicated that initial opioid analgesic recipients were 32% less likely of having a pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit [aOR: 0.68 (95% CI: 0.3-0.8)]. CONCLUSION: Majority of postsurgical patients do not require additional pain management strategies. In the 3.7% of patients requiring additional pain management strategies, those initiated on non-opioid analgesics are more likely to have a pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit compared with their opioid recipient counterparts.

Trends in Repeat Opioid Analgesic Prescription Utilization for Acute Pain in Children: 2013-2018.

OBJECTIVE: Our study examined the change in repeat opioid analgesic prescription trends in children and adolescents experiencing acute pain between 2013 and 2018. METHODS: Eligible individuals were children and adolescents between 1 and 17 years of age enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care plan and filled an incident opioid analgesic prescription from 2013 to 2018. A repeat opioid prescription was defined as receiving a subsequent opioid prescription within 30 days from the end of the incident opioid prescription. A generalized linear regression analysis was conducted to examine changes in repeat opioid analgesic dispensing over time at quarterly intervals from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 17,086 children and adolescents receiving an incident opioid analgesic. Of these, 1780 (10.4%) filled a repeat opioid analgesic prescription. There was a significant decline in the repeat opioid analgesic trend from 11.5% in Q1 2013 to 9.6% in Q4 2018. Stratified analyses by age, sex, and race and ethnicity in a sub-cohort of patients undergoing surgical procedures showed that a significant decline in repeat opioid utilization over time has been observed in all racial/ethnic groups stratified by age and sex, with the most significant decline found in non-Hispanic White children and Hispanic adolescents. At the end of the 6-year follow-up, the racial and ethnic variations in repeat opioid utilization associated with surgical procedures had significantly reduced in children yet persisted among adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 10% of incident pediatric opioid analgesic recipients received a repeat opioid prescription. There has been a moderate but steady decline (∼7% per quarter) in repeat opioid analgesic utilization between 2013 and 2018.

Asthma outcomes in pediatric patients with 30-day follow-up after an asthma hospitalization in a Medicaid-managed care program.

BACKGROUND: National asthma guidelines recommend an outpatient follow-up after hospitalization for asthma. Our aim is determine if a follow-up visit within 30 days after an asthma hospitalization impacts risk for re-hospitalization and emergency department visits for asthma within the following year. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of claims data of Texas Children's Health Plan (a Medicaid managed care program) members age 1 to <18 years and hospitalized for asthma between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018. Primary outcomes were days to re-hospitalization and emergency department visit between 30 days and 365 days following the index hospitalization. RESULTS: We identified 1,485 children age 1 to <18 years hospitalized for asthma. Comparing those with a 30 day follow-up to those without, there was no difference in days to re-hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio 1.23, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.74-2.06) or emergency department visit for asthma (aHR 1.08, 95% CI 0.88-1.33). Inhaled corticosteroid and short acting beta agonist dispensing were greater in the group completing the 30 day follow-up (means of 2.8 and 4.8 respectively for those with follow-up, 1.6 and 3.5 respectively for those without, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Having a follow-up outpatient visit within 30 days of an asthma hospitalization is not associated with a decrease in asthma re-hospitalization or emergency department visit in the 30-365 day period following the index hospitalization. Non-adherence to regular use of inhaled corticosteroid medication was high in both groups. These findings suggest need for improvement in the quality and quantity of post hospital asthma follow-up.

An assessment of the predictive value of low risk criteria for children with intermittent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Current asthma guidelines recommend short acting beta agonist medication (SABA) be used in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid to reduce risk for severe asthma exacerbations. This may not be appropriate for patients at low risk for severe exacerbations. METHODS: This study is a cohort study using computerized claims data from Texas Children's Health Plan. Inclusion criteria were members 1 to <18 years with a diagnosis of asthma in a baseline year between 2016 and 2018 and who had ≤2 SABA canisters or equivalent dispensed, no oral corticosteroid or inhaled corticosteroid dispensing, no asthma hospitalizations, and no asthma emergency department visits in the baseline year. Follow up year outcomes of asthma hospitalizations and emergency department visits were determined for the year following the baseline year. FINDINGS: Forty-five thousand two hundred and thiry health plan members 1 to <18 years met inclusion criteria. The rate of follow up year asthma hospitalization was 1.1 per thousand for those with no baseline SABA dispensing and 1.5 per thousand for those with >0 and ≤2 SABA canister dispensings (p = 0.3). Follow up year Emergency Department visits rates were 14 per thousand and 17 per thousand, respectively (p = 0.08). In analyses adjusted for age group, the follow up year asthma hospitalization rate was not different comparing the 0 SABA to the >0 and ≤2 SABA canister dispensings group (odds ratio: 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.54-1.81). INTERPRETATION: Asthma patients at low risk for severe exacerbations can be identified. This information can be useful to guide treatment decisions.

Association Between Initial Opioid Prescription Duration and 30-Day Risk of Receiving Repeat Opioid Among Children.

OBJECTIVE: Our study evaluated the association between initial opioid prescription duration and receipt of a repeat opioid prescription in children. METHODS: Eligible individuals were children between 1 and 17 years of age who enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care plan and filled an incident opioid prescription during 2013 to 2018. An incident prescription was defined as receipt of an opioid analgesic without a prior use for 12 months. A repeat opioid prescription was defined as receipt of a subsequent opioid prescription within 30 days since the end of incident opioid prescription. A hierarchical multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to test the association between incident opioid prescription duration and the likelihood of receiving a repeat prescription. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 17,086 children receiving an incident opioid prescription in which 6272 (36.7%) received 1 to 3 days' supply, 8442 (49.4%) received 4 to 7 days' supply, 1434 (8.4%) received 8 to 10 days' supply, and 938 (5.5%) received >10 days' supply. Of these incident opioid recipients, 1780 (10.4%) filled a repeat opioid prescription. The multilevel model results indicated that, children receiving 4 to 7 days' supply (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.98 {0.9-1.1}), 8 to 10 days' supply (aOR: 1.03 [0.8-1.3]), and >10 days' supply (aOR: 0.85 [0.7-1.1]) had comparable likelihoods of receiving a repeat prescription as those receiving 1 to 3 days' supply. DISCUSSION: Nearly 10% of children who filled an opioid prescription for acute pain received a repeat prescription. Initial prescription duration was not associated with the risk of receiving a repeat prescription.

Evaluation of a pediatric asthma high-risk scoring algorithm.

OBJECTIVES: Identification of patients with asthma at increased risk for hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visits presents opportunity for intervention. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of computerized health plan claims data. METHODS: Texas Children's Health Plan, a large Medicaid managed care program, developed an asthma risk scoring algorithm using the clinically relevant parameters of hospitalization for asthma, ED visits for asthma, short-acting ß agonist medication dispensing, inhaled corticosteroid medication dispensing, number of prescribing providers, loss to follow-up, and oral corticosteroid dispensing. The risk score performance was evaluated using 2016-2018 risk scores to predict 2017-2019 asthma hospitalizations and ED visits. RESULTS: We identified 107,811 unique members aged 1 to less than 18 years with an asthma diagnosis. For those aged 3 to less than 18 years, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for risk score predicting hospitalization ranged from 0.72 to 0.79. For those aged 1 to less than 3 years, the AUC ranged from 0.65 to 0.69. Those with a risk score of 1 or greater accounted for 20% to 23% of pediatric members 3 to less than 18 years with asthma but 53% to 56% of asthma hospitalizations in the follow-up year. Sixteen to eighteen percent of those aged 3 to less than 18 years with a risk score of 9 or greater were hospitalized in the follow-up year. CONCLUSIONS: Texas Children's Health Plan asthma risk score stratifies risk of asthma hospitalization and ED visits for Medicaid-insured children. The risk score performs better for children aged 3 to less than 18 years than for those aged 1 to less than 3 years.

Risk of asthma exacerbation associated with opioid and nonopioid analgesic use in children with current asthma.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, asthma occurs in a vast proportion of children and adolescents. Asthma exacerbation is an acute episodic event typically characterized by difficulty in breathing, chest tightness, coughing, or wheezing. Severe asthma exacerbation can be life-threatening and lead to service utilizations such as hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. Opioid analgesic use can trigger an asthma exacerbation through 2 pharmacological mechanisms. Despite the potential mechanisms, there is lack of empirical evidence to determine the risk of asthma exacerbation and its association with opioid use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of asthma exacerbation in children with current asthma receiving an opioid vs a nonopioid analgesic. METHODS: Eligible individuals aged under 18 years with current asthma and receiving an incident analgesic prescription were identified from a large Medicaid managed care database during 2013-2018. Current asthma was defined as receipt of an asthma diagnosis and an antiasthmatic medication in the 12 months before analgesic medication initiation. Asthma exacerbation was defined as a hospitalization or ED visit with asthma as either the primary or secondary diagnosis within 3 days of receipt of an analgesic prescription. A weighted multivariable logistic regression using inverse probability treatment weighting was performed to test the association between use of analgesic medication and risk of asthma exacerbation. RESULTS: This study included 13,359 children with current asthma who filled either an incident opioid (n = 5,363, 40.1%) or nonopioid analgesic (n = 7,996, 59.9%) prescription. Asthma exacerbation was observed in 24 (0.5%) opioid analgesic recipients and 22 (0.3%) nonopioid analgesic recipients within 3 days of analgesic initiation. Weighted logistic regression results showed that children receiving opioid analgesics (adjusted odds ratio = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.9-2.9) did not have a statistically significantly higher risk of asthma exacerbation than their nonopioid analgesic recipient counterparts in the propensity score-weighted multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma exacerbation associated with analgesic use in children with current asthma was an uncommon event, and the risk was comparable among children receiving opioid vs nonopioid analgesics. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported and funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Project Number: 1R03HS026790-01A1. The study content was solely the responsibility of the authors, and AHRQ had no role in the design and conduct of the study. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Utilization of opioid versus non-opioid analgesics in Medicaid and CHIP enrolled children with current asthma.

PURPOSE: Opioid analgesics are frequently dispensed in children despite its known risk in children with a compromised airway function. The objectives of the study were to assess the prevalence of opioid analgesic dispensing in children with current asthma and to identify patient and prescriber factors associated with the dispensing of opioid versus non-opioid analgesics. METHODS: Children <18 years of age, having current asthma and receiving an incident analgesic prescription were identified from a large Medicaid Managed Care Plan during years 2013 through 2018. Current asthma was defined as both receiving an asthma diagnosis and filling an anti-asthmatic medication during the 12-month period prior to the analgesic medication initiation. A scoring algorithm was applied to associate analgesic prescription with procedures and diagnoses according to perceived need for analgesia and time proximity. RESULTS: Of the 9529 children meeting the inclusion criteria, 2681 (28.1%) received an opioid prescription. Opioid analgesic dispensing was most common among children who had an outpatient surgery/procedure (29.4%), trauma (19.4%) dental procedure (18.4%), and respiratory infection (10.6%). Multivariable analysis indicated that non-Hispanic Black (AOR: 0.39[0.3-0.5]) and Hispanic (AOR: 0.51[0.4-0.6]) children were less likely to receive an opioid analgesic compared to their non-Hispanic White counterparts. Children with prior history of asthma-related emergency department visit (AOR: 1.24[1.0-1.5]) and short acting beta agonist overuse (AOR: 1.33[1.1-1.7]) were more likely to fill an opioid analgesic prescription than those without. CONCLUSION: Opioid analgesics are frequently dispensed to children with asthma. A higher dispensing rate was observed among non-Hispanic White children and among those with a history of uncontrolled asthma.

Improvement in Pulmonary Function Following Discontinuation of Vaping or E-Cigarette Use in Adolescents with EVALI.

Introduction: In 2019, an alarming number of cases coined as e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) were described in adolescents ranging from mild respiratory distress to fulminant respiratory failure. Limited data have been published on outcomes at short-term follow-up. We aimed to describe pulmonary manifestations, function, and radiologic findings after corticosteroid therapy in a cohort of adolescent patients. Methods: A retrospective chart analysis of all patients presenting to our institution between July 2019 and December 2019 with EVALI was conducted. Patients who had pulmonary follow-up were included. Spirometry was performed before discharge from the hospital and during outpatient follow-up. A paired t-test was used to compare serial spirometry data between visits. Results: Eight patients (6 males) were included. Two patients required intubation with mechanical ventilation, 2 required bilevel positive airway pressure, and 3 required oxygen supplementation. All patients received glucocorticoids (3 receiving pulse dosing). Initial spirometry revealed decreased forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity with clinically and statistically significant improvement at follow-up (mean follow-up was 46.5 days). Radiographic manifestations also improved after vaping was discontinued. Conclusion: In our cohort of patients with EVALI, at short-term follow-up, all normalized their spirometry parameters and showed clinical resolution of symptoms.

Harms of Electronic Cigarettes: What the Healthcare Provider Needs to Know.

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) reached the market without either extensive preclinical toxicology testing or long-term safety trials that would be required of conventional therapeutics or medical devices. E-cigarettes are considered a tobacco product and as such have no manufacturing quality or safety standards. A growing body of evidence documents severe harms from e-cigarette use, including injuries from product explosions, nicotine poisoning, and severe lung diseases. Commonly used e-cigarette components have significant inhalation toxicity. Emerging evidence from laboratory studies suggests substantial reason for concern for long-term harms, including risk for cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive lung disease, and cancer. Rather than helping people stop smoking, e-cigarette use is associated with reduced rates of smoking cessation among current smokers and an increased risk of relapse to smoking among former smokers. The World Health Organization advises, "Unlike the tried and tested nicotine and non-nicotine pharmacotherapies that are known to help people quit tobacco use, WHO does not endorse e-cigarettes as cessation aids." Careful evaluation of all the available research justifies a strong recommendation that healthcare providers should neither prescribe nor recommend e-cigarettes for persons who are tobacco dependent. If a patient is dependent on e-cigarettes, the healthcare provider should provide counseling and treatment (of nicotine dependence) to help the patient to stop their e-cigarette use.

Initiating Pharmacologic Treatment in Tobacco-Dependent Adults. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Background: Current tobacco treatment guidelines have established the efficacy of available interventions, but they do not provide detailed guidance for common implementation questions frequently faced in the clinic. An evidence-based guideline was created that addresses several pharmacotherapy-initiation questions that routinely confront treatment teams.Methods: Individuals with diverse expertise related to smoking cessation were empaneled to prioritize questions and outcomes important to clinicians. An evidence-synthesis team conducted systematic reviews, which informed recommendations to answer the questions. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach was used to rate the certainty in the estimated effects and the strength of recommendations.Results: The guideline panel formulated five strong recommendations and two conditional recommendations regarding pharmacotherapy choices. Strong recommendations include using varenicline rather than a nicotine patch, using varenicline rather than bupropion, using varenicline rather than a nicotine patch in adults with a comorbid psychiatric condition, initiating varenicline in adults even if they are unready to quit, and using controller therapy for an extended treatment duration greater than 12 weeks. Conditional recommendations include combining a nicotine patch with varenicline rather than using varenicline alone and using varenicline rather than electronic cigarettes.Conclusions: Seven recommendations are provided, which represent simple practice changes that are likely to increase the effectiveness of tobacco-dependence pharmacotherapy.

E-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury in the pediatric population: imaging features at presentation and short-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Cases of e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) have rapidly reached epidemic proportions, yet there remain limited reports within the literature on the associated imaging findings. OBJECTIVE: We describe the most common imaging findings observed on chest computed tomography (CT) and chest radiograph (CXR) at presentation and at short-term follow-up at our major pediatric hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the electronic medical records was performed on all patients with suspected EVALI who were treated at a major pediatric hospital and 11 patients were included for analysis. Two board-certified pediatric radiologists then categorized the CXRs as either normal or abnormal, and further performed a systematic review of the chest CTs for imaging findings in the lungs, pleura and mediastinum. Interrater discordance was reconciled by consensus review. RESULTS: The 11 patients (9 males:2 females) ranged in age from 14 to 18 years. Gastrointestinal and constitutional symptoms were present in all patients, whereas shortness of breath and cough were reported in 5/11 and 6/11 patients, respectively. The CXR was abnormal in 10/11 patients, whereas all chest CTs were abnormal. The most common CT findings included consolidation, ground-glass opacities, interlobular septal thickening, lymphadenopathy and crazy-paving pattern. Almost all patients demonstrated subpleural sparing, and less than half also demonstrated peribronchovascular sparing. There was complete or near-complete resolution of imaging abnormalities in 5/6 patients with a median follow-up duration of 114 days. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary opacities with subpleural and peribronchovascular sparing was a commonly observed pattern of EVALI in the pediatric population at this institution. A CXR may not be sufficiently sensitive in diagnosing EVALI, and radiologists and clinicians should exercise caution when excluding EVALI based on the lack of a pulmonary opacity. Caution should also be exercised when excluding EVALI solely based on the lack of respiratory symptoms. Despite extensive pulmonary involvement at presentation, findings may resolve on short-term follow-up imaging.

Differential asthma odds following respiratory infection in children from three minority populations.

RATIONALE: Severe early-life respiratory illnesses, particularly those caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human rhinovirus (HRV), are strongly associated with the development of asthma in children. Puerto Rican children in particular have a strikingly high asthma burden. However, prior studies of the potential associations between early-life respiratory illnesses and asthma in Puerto Rican and other minority populations have been limited. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether early-life respiratory illness was associated with asthma in Puerto Rican, Mexican American, and African American children. METHODS: Using a logistic regression analysis, we examined the association between early-life respiratory illnesses (report of upper respiratory infection (URI), pneumonia, bronchitis, and bronchiolitis/RSV) within the first two years of life and physician-diagnosed asthma after the age of two in a large cohort of Puerto Rican, Mexican American, and African American children. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: While early-life respiratory illnesses were associated with greater asthma odds in Puerto Ricans, Mexican Americans, and African Americans, these associations were stronger among Puerto Rican children. Specifically, in Puerto Ricans, the odds was 6.15 (95% CI: 4.21-9.05) if the child reported at least one of the following respiratory illness: URI, pneumonia, bronchitis or bronchiolitis. The odds were also higher in Puerto Ricans when considering these conditions separately. CONCLUSIONS: We observed population-specific associations between early-life respiratory illnesses and asthma, which were especially significant and stronger in Puerto Ricans. Taken together with the known high burden of RSV in Puerto Rico, our results may help explain the high burden of asthma in Puerto Ricans.